Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
Agency dossier · NSF

National Science Foundation

17 reported use cases, 0.5% of all federal records. Rank reflects what was reported, not performance.

#23by records#25by deployed#15by high-impact#37by completenessof 41 agencies
Reported use cases170.5% of all federal recordsDeployed212%Pilots424%High-impact00 answered any practice question
Disclosure completeness25%Mean of 12 core fields

Technology portfolio

Click a segment for records
17use cases

Mission mix

Topic area as reported

Lifecycle

17 records
Within each stageHigh-impact · Gen./agentic
Pre-deployment0%0%
Pilot0%0%
Deployed0%0%

Lifecycle timeline

By agency-reported start year
05<15'15'16'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'249'25'26
Generative or agenticOther or unclassified17 of 17 records report a parseable start date

Position against all agencies

This agency vs the federal inventory
Deployed share12%vs 29%
High-impact share0%vs 12%
Generative or agentic0%vs 27%
Sourcing reported0%vs 44%
In-house development0%vs 28%
Disclosure completeness25%vs 67%

Cyan: NSF. Ring: all 3,611 records. Differences describe reporting, not quality.

Governance evidence

0 high-impact use cases · share reported in place

This agency designated no use cases as high-impact, so the minimum-practice questions did not apply.

No answer is missing evidence, not evidence that a safeguard is absent. Click a segment to open those records.

Sourcing and vendors

Sourcing reported for 0%

No vendor on the standard list.

Related use cases

High-impact first, then deployed and most completeAll 17

Comparable portfolios

Most similar technology mix

Similarity is the cosine of each agency's AI-classification counts (unreported excluded); agencies with 10+ records. Click to compare side by side.

Operational functions

Keyword-derived tags

Field completeness vs. all agencies

Share of records with the field filled
Stage
100% vs 91%
High-impact designation
0% vs 88%
Topic area
0% vs 83%
AI classification
0% vs 82%
Problem
100% vs 84%
Benefits
0% vs 82%
Outputs
0% vs 79%
Sourcing
0% vs 44%
Start date
100% vs 39%
ATO
0% vs 43%
PII
0% vs 42%
Custom code
0% vs 47%

Bar: this agency. White tick: all agencies. A gap is a reporting gap, not a finding about the systems.

Bureaus and components

9 reported
Directorate for Technology, Innovation, and Partnership (TIP)424%4 records · 23.5% of 17
Office of Integrative Activities (OIA)318%3 records · 17.6% of 17
Directorate of Engineering (ENG)212%2 records · 11.8% of 17
Office for Legislative and Public Affairs (OLPA)212%2 records · 11.8% of 17
Office of Information and Resource Management (OIRM)212%2 records · 11.8% of 17
Directorate for Biological Sciences (BIO)16%1 records · 5.9% of 17
Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering (CISE)16%1 records · 5.9% of 17
Directorate for STEM Education (EDU)16%1 records · 5.9% of 17
Office of Chief Information Officer (OCIO)16%1 records · 5.9% of 17