NASA · NASA-490 · record R0256
AIML for Code Review and Workforce Augmentation (converted to collective)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration · WS: White Sands Test Facility
Overview
- Development stage
- RetiredSource: d) Retired – The use case was reported in the agency’s prior year’s inventory, but its development and/or use has since been discontinued.
- High-impact designation
- Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
- Impact justification
- Not reported
- Start date
- Not reported
- Withheld from public reporting
- NoSource: a) No
Mission
- Topic area
- Science
- Operational functions
- Software development assistance Derived by keyword rules; see methodology
Problem the AI is intended to solve
AI Studio API to GIT type Repositories for Code Review, Debating Agent implementation, and automation.
Expected benefits
AI Studio API to GIT type Repositories for Code Review, Debating Agent implementation, and automation.
System outputs
code reviews
Technology
- AI classification
- Natural language processingSource: Natural Language Processing: AI that processes, interprets, and shares information in human language.
- System name(s)
- Not reported
- Custom-developed code
- Not reported
- Public source code
- Not reported
Sourcing
- How it was built
- Not reported
- Vendor (as reported)
- Not reported
- Vendors (standardized)
- None on the standard list
A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.
Data and privacy
- Involves PII
- Not reported
- Privacy Impact Assessment
- Not reported
- Authorization to Operate
- Not reported
- Demographic features
- Not reported
- Training and evaluation data
- Not reported
- Federal Data Catalog
- Not reported
Governance
0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.
Pre-deployment testingNo answer reported
AI impact assessmentNo answer reported
Independent reviewNo answer reported
Ongoing monitoringNo answer reported
Operator trainingNo answer reported
Fail-safeNo answer reported
Appeal processNo answer reported
User and public consultationNo answer reported
Potential impacts and how they were identified
Not reported