Multimodal Earth Observation Workflow for Machine Learning (MEOW-ML): A Case Study in Canopy Height Model and Canopy Height Change Prediction
National Aeronautics and Space Administration · GSFC: Goddard Space Flight Center
Overview
- Development stage
- In development or acquisitionSource: a) Pre-deployment – The use case is in a development or acquisition status.
- High-impact designation
- Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
- Impact justification
- Not reported
- Start date
- Not reported
- Withheld from public reporting
- NoSource: a) No
Mission
- Topic area
- Science
- Operational functions
- No function tag matched Derived by keyword rules; see methodology
Problem the AI is intended to solve
Here we introduce an updated version of Multimodal Earth Observation Workflow for Machine Learning (MEOW-ML), an end-to-end data fusion and artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) framework tailored for Earth Observation (EO). MEOW-ML supports the full AI/ML lifecycle, from data preparation to model training and evaluation.
Expected benefits
It speeds up the iterative loops of data processing and model architecture development, and, critically, enables the integration of heterogeneous data sources. A primary intent for MEOW-ML is its application in the design of New Observing Strategies (NOS) which require very large data sets with data of diverse types acquired by a variety of sensors potentially aboard multiple sub-orbital and orbital platforms. MEOW-ML can be used to test various combinations of data types, qualities and resolutions to optimize the design of an NOS.
System outputs
As an example, we present a trained ML model with promising performance using this framework, for predicting forest productivity and degradation over time by using canopy height change (CHC) as a proxy. We conducted modeling at two spatial resolutions to illustrate the potential use of this framework for NOS design activities.
Technology
- AI classification
- Classical / predictive MLSource: Classical/Predictive Machine Learning: Models trained on data to make predictions or classifications based on identified patterns or relatio…
- System name(s)
- Not reported
- Custom-developed code
- Not reported
- Public source code
- Not reported
Sourcing
- How it was built
- Not reported
- Vendor (as reported)
- Not reported
- Vendors (standardized)
- None on the standard list
A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.
Data and privacy
- Involves PII
- Not reported
- Privacy Impact Assessment
- Not reported
- Authorization to Operate
- Not reported
- Demographic features
- Not reported
- Training and evaluation data
- Not reported
- Federal Data Catalog
- Not reported
Governance
0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.
Potential impacts and how they were identified
Not reported