Integrating Explainable Machine Learning with Physics for Enhanced Wildfire Detection in Observation-Constrained Environments
National Aeronautics and Space Administration · GSFC: Goddard Space Flight Center
Overview
- Development stage
- In development or acquisitionSource: a) Pre-deployment – The use case is in a development or acquisition status.
- High-impact designation
- Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
- Impact justification
- Not reported
- Start date
- Not reported
- Withheld from public reporting
- NoSource: a) No
Mission
- Topic area
- Science
- Operational functions
- Forecasting and prediction Derived by keyword rules; see methodology
Problem the AI is intended to solve
Satellite-based fire detection provides critical data for fire management, fire spread modeling, air quality forecasts, and assessments of fire impacts on ecosystems and communities. Current fire detection algorithms, whether physics-based or machine learning (ML)-based, frequently fail when wildfires are obscured by dense clouds or smoke, creating data gaps that degrade the quality of air quality and fire emissions estimates. This project will develop an explainable multitask ML model for fire detection that is integrated with cloud and aerosol retrieval to enhance fire detection capabilities under clouds.
Expected benefits
The research has the potential to subtantially improve satellite-based fire detection, a key application and societal benefit from NASA's Earth science program, based on more consistent detection of fire activity needed for fire tracking and situational awareness, and improved detection under difficult observing conditions, including on days when extreme fire behavior generates deep injection of smoke (pyrocumulonimbus or PyroCb).
System outputs
Outputs will be joint retrievals of cloud and aerosol vertical profile information and fire detections.
Technology
- AI classification
- Classical / predictive MLSource: Classical/Predictive Machine Learning: Models trained on data to make predictions or classifications based on identified patterns or relatio…
- System name(s)
- Not reported
- Custom-developed code
- Not reported
- Public source code
- Not reported
Sourcing
- How it was built
- Not reported
- Vendor (as reported)
- Not reported
- Vendors (standardized)
- None on the standard list
A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.
Data and privacy
- Involves PII
- Not reported
- Privacy Impact Assessment
- Not reported
- Authorization to Operate
- Not reported
- Demographic features
- Not reported
- Training and evaluation data
- Not reported
- Federal Data Catalog
- Not reported
Governance
0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.
Potential impacts and how they were identified
Not reported