Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
NASA · NASA-912 · record R0508

IV&V Process Accelerators through Generative AI Capabilities

National Aeronautics and Space Administration · GSFC: Goddard Space Flight Center

Overview

Development stage
In development or acquisitionSource: a) Pre-deployment – The use case is in a development or acquisition status.
High-impact designation
Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
Impact justification
Not reported
Start date
Not reported
Withheld from public reporting
NoSource: a) No

Mission

Topic area
Science
Operational functions
No function tag matched Derived by keyword rules; see methodology

Problem the AI is intended to solve

This project is a collection of utility tools that generated by personnel and early adopters at the NASA IV&V Program who have explored and prototyped generative AI applications that can streamline and enhance Independent Verification & Validation (IV&V) activities. Process accelerator efforts focus on automating common, high-effort tasks such as Technical Issue Memorandum (TIM) / formal IV&V issue generation, automated peer review support of technical issues, milestone review summaries, NASA program risk mapping to open IV&V issues, and automated assurance conclusion statements. Additional concepts include automated generation of value statements, status reports, sensitivity/content classification, Tier 1 security-related queries on NASA programs, and IV&V methods generation. These exploratory activities serve as feasibility studies, demonstrating how generative AI can reduce analyst workload, accelerate analysis and reporting, and provide a foundation for future funded capabilities. Insights gained from these concepts directly inform NASA IV&V’s broader AI strategy, guiding the maturation and adoption of advanced assurance tools.

Expected benefits

Results and positive outcomes from the NASA IV&V Process Accelerator efforts directly inform and strengthen larger, funded AI initiatives. These exploratory activities have demonstrated how generative AI can streamline traditionally resource and labor-intensive tasks. Even when lightly validated using synthetic or open-source data, these proofs of concept activities highlight that routine, high-effort activities can be effectively automated to a practical degree. This includes processing vast quantities of data in a deterministic manner and providing an end user product for human review and additional analysis, where needed. Collectively, these concepts showcase the potential of generative AI to enhance efficiency, reduce analyst workload, and provide a foundation for more advanced AI-driven capabilities in support of NASA's missions.

System outputs

Outputs on these concept development efforts span pre-processed spreadsheets, large generated Word Documents, and outputs driven to other tools for human review and assessment. Outputs inform feasibility of generative AI capabilities and further implementation plans.

Technology

AI classification
Generative AISource: Generative AI: AI that generates new or synthetic content (e.g., images, videos, audio, text, code).
System name(s)
Not reported
Custom-developed code
Not reported
Public source code
Not reported

Sourcing

How it was built
Not reported
Vendor (as reported)
Not reported
Vendors (standardized)
None on the standard list

A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.

Data and privacy

Involves PII
Not reported
Privacy Impact Assessment
Not reported
Authorization to Operate
Not reported
Demographic features
Not reported
Training and evaluation data
Not reported
Federal Data Catalog
Not reported

Governance

0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.

Pre-deployment testingNo answer reported
AI impact assessmentNo answer reported
Independent reviewNo answer reported
Ongoing monitoringNo answer reported
Operator trainingNo answer reported
Fail-safeNo answer reported
Appeal processNo answer reported
User and public consultationNo answer reported

Potential impacts and how they were identified

Not reported