HHS · no agency ID · record R0643

Reviewing Global Influenza Vaccine Literature

Department of Health and Human Services · HHS/CDC

Overview

Development stage: PilotSource: b) Pilot – The use case has been deployed in a limited test or pilot capacity.
High-impact designation: Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
Impact justification: Not reported
Start date: 2024-10 (month precision)Source: Oct-24
Withheld from public reporting: NoSource: a) No

Mission

Topic area: Health and Medical
Operational functions: No function tag matched Derived by keyword rules; see methodology

Problem the AI is intended to solve

To efficiently review a large volume of published literature and identify abstracts related to access to influenza vaccines.

Expected benefits

The AI system is expected to save significant staff time by automating the initial literature review process, allowing epidemiologists to focus on in-depth analysis of relevant publications. This increases efficiency and scalability in reviewing global literature related to vaccine access.

System outputs

A list of abstracts from published journal articles that are relevant to vaccine access. These abstracts are identified using large language models and are then reviewed manually for further analysis.

Technology

AI classification: Natural language processingSource: Natural Language Processing: AI that processes, interprets, and shares information in human language.
System name(s): EDAV (Enterprise Data Analytics and Visualization Platform)
Custom-developed code: Yes
Public source code: Not reported

Sourcing

How it was built: Developed in-houseSource: b) Developed in-house
Vendor (as reported): Not reported
Vendors (standardized): None on the standard list

A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.

Data and privacy

Involves PII: No
Privacy Impact Assessment: Not reported
Authorization to Operate: Yes
Demographic features: k) None of the above
Training and evaluation data: Published journal articles accessed through freely available sources or via CDC research agreements.
Federal Data Catalog: Not reported

Governance

0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.

Pre-deployment testingNo answer reported

AI impact assessmentNo answer reported

Independent reviewNo answer reported

Ongoing monitoringNo answer reported

Operator trainingNo answer reported

Fail-safeNo answer reported

Appeal processNo answer reported

User and public consultationNo answer reported

Potential impacts and how they were identified

Not reported