Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
HHS · no agency ID · record R0698

Pathogen strain characterization from mixed strain samples

Department of Health and Human Services · HHS/CDC

Overview

Development stage
In development or acquisitionSource: a) Pre-deployment – The use case is in a development or acquisition status.
High-impact designation
Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
Impact justification
Not reported
Start date
Not reported
Withheld from public reporting
NoSource: a) No

Mission

Topic area
Science
Operational functions
Biometrics and identity, Clinical and medical Derived by keyword rules; see methodology

Problem the AI is intended to solve

We use the DNA sequences at specific places in pathogen genomes to create a "DNA fingerprint" that allows us to link cases of diarrheal illness and identify potential foodborne outbreaks. When a single patient has more than one strain of the same pathogen (e.g. two pathogenic E. coli), the pieces of the DNA fingerprint get mixed together in the sample and make the data unusable for outbreak surveillance. Our ML-based method is intended to sort the pieces of the DNA fingerprints into separate strains and make this data usable for foodborne outbreak surveillance.

Expected benefits

Surveillance for diarrheal foodborne outbreaks currently depends upon the availability of bacterial isolates obtained from patient stools to obtain the pathogen "genomic fingerprints" identifying pathogen strains. The availability of these isolates for fingerprinting is declining nationwide due to technological advancements that improve patient care. To maintain our ability to detect outbreaks without isolates, CDC is developing laboratory methods that obtain the pathogen genomic fingerprint directly from the patient stool specimen. However, patient stools frequently contain more than one strain of pathogen, so the ability to deploy these methods and maintain the sensitivity of foodborne outbreak surveillance is dependent upon development of this ML-based method to sort pathogen genomic fingerprint pieces from stool. Based on FoodNet data, we estimate that failure to implement these methods could lead to the loss of up to 75% of the samples currently captured by surveillance for some pathogens. Fewer surveillance samples will mean fewer outbreaks are detected and it will take longer to detect them, resulting in more people affected. For a sense of the scale of the challenge, NORS recorded ~300 outbreaks of Salmonella and E. coli in 2023 that were detected as a result of isolate-based surveillance. Economic impact evaluations have estimated that PulseNet surveillance alone prevents ~270,000 cases of foodborne illness in the US annually for a savings of at least $500,000,000 to the economy.

System outputs

Our ML-based method 1) predicts the number of strains of a pathogen found in a single sample, 2) reports the DNA fingerprint defining each strain, and 3) gives the likelihood that two samples contain the same pathogen strain.

Technology

AI classification
Classical / predictive MLSource: Classical/Predictive Machine Learning: Models trained on data to make predictions or classifications based on identified patterns or relatio…
System name(s)
Not reported
Custom-developed code
Not reported
Public source code
Not reported

Sourcing

How it was built
Not reported
Vendor (as reported)
Not reported
Vendors (standardized)
None on the standard list

A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.

Data and privacy

Involves PII
Not reported
Privacy Impact Assessment
Not reported
Authorization to Operate
Not reported
Demographic features
Not reported
Training and evaluation data
Not reported
Federal Data Catalog
Not reported

Governance

0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.

Pre-deployment testingNo answer reported
AI impact assessmentNo answer reported
Independent reviewNo answer reported
Ongoing monitoringNo answer reported
Operator trainingNo answer reported
Fail-safeNo answer reported
Appeal processNo answer reported
User and public consultationNo answer reported

Potential impacts and how they were identified

Not reported