Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
HHS · no agency ID · record R0725

Respirator Selection Logic (RSL) Copilot

Department of Health and Human Services · HHS/CDC

Overview

Development stage
In development or acquisitionSource: a) Pre-deployment – The use case is in a development or acquisition status.
High-impact designation
Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
Impact justification
Not reported
Start date
Not reported
Withheld from public reporting
NoSource: a) No

Mission

Topic area
Service Delivery
Operational functions
Software development assistance Derived by keyword rules; see methodology

Problem the AI is intended to solve

Workers rely on NIOSH Approved respirators to protect them from inhaling high-consequence particulate, gas, and vapor hazards. Some examples of these respiratory hazards include: • Wildfire, structural, or surgical smoke • Mold during post-flood remediation efforts • Infectious diseases such as tuberculosis • Chemicals used to clean or disinfect • Particles liberated when cutting rock in industries such as construction and mining Selecting the correct respirator to protect workers requires knowledge of the hazard or hazards present, the job task, and the environment. NIOSH’s Respirator Selection Logic (RSL) is a state-of-the-art tool designed to guide the selection of appropriate respiratory protection devices based on specific workplace hazards and conditions. The RSL requires users to enter detailed, task- and environment-specific information at multiple decision points to execute its logic correctly.

Expected benefits

No current AI tool operationalizes the RSL while addressing the challenge of gathering and validating highly specific input information required at each decision point. The absence of such assistance leads to errors in respirator selection that can cause hazardous exposures, regulatory violations, and adverse health outcomes. Developing Ally to close this gap will improve the effectiveness of respiratory protection programs by ensuring that users supply accurate, relevant data to the RSL, thereby enhancing the quality and traceability of respiratory protection decisions aligned with established federal guidance.

System outputs

Upon completion of this project, users of the RSL will be able to: • Receive real-time guidance on what information is required for respirator selection and why it matters. • Provide input in natural language rather than navigating technical documents or forms manually. • Understand and apply the RSL more effectively, leading to fewer errors in respirator selection, improved compliance, and stronger respiratory protection outcomes. • Use Ally as a decision support tool—not a decision maker—to identify and clarify required inputs, understand the rationale behind each RSL step, and access authoritative guidance. The Copilot will always keep the user in the loop, helping them apply judgment while ensuring traceability to official sources like NIOSH and OSHA. This project will demonstrate how AI can support complex public health decision tools like the RSL while maintaining user accountability, transparency, and regulatory defensibility.

Technology

AI classification
Natural language processingSource: Natural Language Processing: AI that processes, interprets, and shares information in human language.
System name(s)
Not reported
Custom-developed code
Not reported
Public source code
Not reported

Sourcing

How it was built
Not reported
Vendor (as reported)
Not reported
Vendors (standardized)
None on the standard list

A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.

Data and privacy

Involves PII
Not reported
Privacy Impact Assessment
Not reported
Authorization to Operate
Not reported
Demographic features
Not reported
Training and evaluation data
Not reported
Federal Data Catalog
Not reported

Governance

0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.

Pre-deployment testingNo answer reported
AI impact assessmentNo answer reported
Independent reviewNo answer reported
Ongoing monitoringNo answer reported
Operator trainingNo answer reported
Fail-safeNo answer reported
Appeal processNo answer reported
User and public consultationNo answer reported

Potential impacts and how they were identified

Not reported