Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
HHS · no agency ID · record R0827

Renamed: Module 3 Facilities Extraction Previously: Module 3 Faculties

Department of Health and Human Services · HHS/FDA/CDER

Overview

Development stage
DeployedSource: c) Deployed – The use case is being actively authorized or utilized to support the functions or mission of an agency.
High-impact designation
Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
Impact justification
Not reported
Start date
2024-02 (month precision)Source: Feb-24
Withheld from public reporting
NoSource: a) No

Mission

Topic area
Health and Medical
Operational functions
Document processing and extraction Derived by keyword rules; see methodology

Problem the AI is intended to solve

FDA receives drug application submissions (ANDA, NDA, BLA) that contain important manufacturing facility information in Module 3 documents, but this data requires manual review to identify and organize all facility details.

Expected benefits

Objective of this use case was to assist in identifying and extracting all drug manufacturing facilities reported within unstructured module 3 submissions from marketing applications to build a comprehensive inventory of drug facilities for better regulatory oversight.

System outputs

Support information extraction from unstructured documents

Technology

AI classification
Generative AISource: Generative AI: AI that generates new or synthetic content (e.g., images, videos, audio, text, code).
System name(s)
CDEROne Analytics: FISMA-high environment
Custom-developed code
Yes
Public source code
Not reported

Sourcing

How it was built
Contract and in-houseSource: c) Developed with both contracting and in-house resources
Vendor (as reported)
Deloitte
Vendors (standardized)
Deloitte

A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.

Data and privacy

Involves PII
No
Privacy Impact Assessment
Not reported
Authorization to Operate
Yes
Demographic features
k) None of the above
Training and evaluation data
applicant submissions
Federal Data Catalog
Not reported

Governance

0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.

Pre-deployment testingNo answer reported
AI impact assessmentNo answer reported
Independent reviewNo answer reported
Ongoing monitoringNo answer reported
Operator trainingNo answer reported
Fail-safeNo answer reported
Appeal processNo answer reported
User and public consultationNo answer reported

Potential impacts and how they were identified

Not reported