Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
HHS · no agency ID · record R0834

HIVE AI Pilot

Department of Health and Human Services · HHS/FDA/CBER

Overview

Development stage
PilotSource: b) Pilot – The use case has been deployed in a limited test or pilot capacity.
High-impact designation
Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
Impact justification
Not reported
Start date
2025-07 (month precision)Source: Jul-25
Withheld from public reporting
NoSource: a) No

Mission

Topic area
Health and Medical
Operational functions
Summarization Derived by keyword rules; see methodology

Problem the AI is intended to solve

The AI is intended to assist in solving several problems related to the review process for INDs. Specifically, it aims to address issues of inefficiency, delays in identifying deficiencies and information overload. By providing recommendations for review disciplines, it helps reviewers to quickly identify potential review disciplines that are required. By identifying grossly deficient submissions early on, it reduces the workload and highlighting key data helps reviewers to focus on higher-level tasks that require their expertise.

Expected benefits

Overall, is designed to improve efficiency and effectiveness of the regulatory review process, allowing for quicker and well-informed decision making

System outputs

The system's output include: 1. review discipline recommendations - automated suggestions for the most appropriate review disciplines for each incoming submission. 2. highlighted key data - generates reports highlighting critical information to facilitate quicker understanding by RPMs and reviewers. 3. Summaries - reports summarizing large documents to potentially accelerate review.

Technology

AI classification
Generative AISource: Generative AI: AI that generates new or synthetic content (e.g., images, videos, audio, text, code).
System name(s)
HIVE
Custom-developed code
Yes
Public source code
the code is not open source, it resides within FDA gitlab repository and is not publicly available

Sourcing

How it was built
Contract and in-houseSource: c) Developed with both contracting and in-house resources
Vendor (as reported)
SAIC
Vendors (standardized)
SAIC

A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.

Data and privacy

Involves PII
Yes
Privacy Impact Assessment
not publicly available
Authorization to Operate
Yes
Demographic features
k) None of the above
Training and evaluation data
use a dataset of previously submitted IND applications, which provided a comprehensive understanding of the types of data and information included in these submission. Feedback and annotations from experienced RPMs and reviewers on a subset of the historical submission, which helps fine-tune the model's understanding of what constitutes a high-quality submission.
Federal Data Catalog
data can not be publicly disclosed as is proprietary information from submissions

Governance

0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.

Pre-deployment testingNo answer reported
AI impact assessmentNo answer reported
Independent reviewNo answer reported
Ongoing monitoringNo answer reported
Operator trainingNo answer reported
Fail-safeNo answer reported
Appeal processNo answer reported
User and public consultationNo answer reported

Potential impacts and how they were identified

Not reported