HIVE AI Pilot
Department of Health and Human Services · HHS/FDA/CBER
Overview
- Development stage
- PilotSource: b) Pilot – The use case has been deployed in a limited test or pilot capacity.
- High-impact designation
- Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
- Impact justification
- Not reported
- Start date
- 2025-07 (month precision)Source: Jul-25
- Withheld from public reporting
- NoSource: a) No
Mission
- Topic area
- Health and Medical
- Operational functions
- Summarization Derived by keyword rules; see methodology
Problem the AI is intended to solve
The AI is intended to assist in solving several problems related to the review process for INDs. Specifically, it aims to address issues of inefficiency, delays in identifying deficiencies and information overload. By providing recommendations for review disciplines, it helps reviewers to quickly identify potential review disciplines that are required. By identifying grossly deficient submissions early on, it reduces the workload and highlighting key data helps reviewers to focus on higher-level tasks that require their expertise.
Expected benefits
Overall, is designed to improve efficiency and effectiveness of the regulatory review process, allowing for quicker and well-informed decision making
System outputs
The system's output include: 1. review discipline recommendations - automated suggestions for the most appropriate review disciplines for each incoming submission. 2. highlighted key data - generates reports highlighting critical information to facilitate quicker understanding by RPMs and reviewers. 3. Summaries - reports summarizing large documents to potentially accelerate review.
Technology
- AI classification
- Generative AISource: Generative AI: AI that generates new or synthetic content (e.g., images, videos, audio, text, code).
- System name(s)
- HIVE
- Custom-developed code
- Yes
- Public source code
- the code is not open source, it resides within FDA gitlab repository and is not publicly available
Sourcing
- How it was built
- Contract and in-houseSource: c) Developed with both contracting and in-house resources
- Vendor (as reported)
- SAIC
- Vendors (standardized)
- SAIC
A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.
Data and privacy
- Involves PII
- Yes
- Privacy Impact Assessment
- not publicly available
- Authorization to Operate
- Yes
- Demographic features
- k) None of the above
- Training and evaluation data
- use a dataset of previously submitted IND applications, which provided a comprehensive understanding of the types of data and information included in these submission. Feedback and annotations from experienced RPMs and reviewers on a subset of the historical submission, which helps fine-tune the model's understanding of what constitutes a high-quality submission.
- Federal Data Catalog
- data can not be publicly disclosed as is proprietary information from submissions
Governance
0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.
Potential impacts and how they were identified
Not reported