AI Audit Resolution Assistant (AIARA)
Department of Health and Human Services · HHS/HRSA
Overview
- Development stage
- PilotSource: b) Pilot – The use case has been deployed in a limited test or pilot capacity.
- High-impact designation
- Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
- Impact justification
- Not reported
- Start date
- 2024-07 (month precision)Source: Jul-24
- Withheld from public reporting
- NoSource: a) No
Mission
- Topic area
- Other
- Operational functions
- Document processing and extraction, Chatbot or virtual assistant, Summarization, Search and knowledge retrieval Derived by keyword rules; see methodology
Problem the AI is intended to solve
The DFI PRF AIARA project leverages AI to streamline the single audit process. The team utilizes the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) to extract data from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse to create templates for both the audit notification and management decision letters, and to generate a comprehensive report of the auditee and its findings.
Expected benefits
Since its launch, the AIARA has successfully processed and resolved 73 audits. Automation has resulted in an estimated total of 276 hours of work saved. The AIARA has significantly enhanced both efficiency and consistency in the audit resolution process.
System outputs
HRSA utilizes generative AI to streamline the Single Audit resolution process and the creation of Management Decision Letters to formally close out and resolve Single audit findings. The AI Audit Resolution Assistant (AIARA) includes a vector database comprised of Single audit documents assigned to HRSA, creates a retrieval augmented generation which integrates with a large language model to intelligently summarize audit findings and recommendations, and provides chatbot capability and reduce the cognitive load on HRSA auditors for any audit-specific questions.
Technology
- AI classification
- Agentic AISource: Agentic AI: AI systems that perform tasks or make decisions autonomously with minimal human intervention.
- System name(s)
- IRMS - UiPath Automation Cloud Public Sector
- Custom-developed code
- Yes
- Public source code
- Not reported
Sourcing
- How it was built
- Contract and in-houseSource: c) Developed with both contracting and in-house resources
- Vendor (as reported)
- Mindpetal
- Vendors (standardized)
- None on the standard list
A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.
Data and privacy
- Involves PII
- No
- Privacy Impact Assessment
- No
- Authorization to Operate
- Yes
- Demographic features
- k) None of the above
- Training and evaluation data
- Single Audit report from FAC.gov
- Federal Data Catalog
- fac.gov
Governance
0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.
Potential impacts and how they were identified
Not reported