NICHD RPAB AI/ML NICHD Relevance Model
Department of Health and Human Services · HHS/NIH
Overview
- Development stage
- PilotSource: b) Pilot – The use case has been deployed in a limited test or pilot capacity.
- High-impact designation
- Presumed high-impact, determined notSource: b) Presumed high-impact, but determined not high impact
- Impact justification
- The primary objective is to improve the efficiency, accuracy, and consistency of grant application referral assignments while streamlining the internal process for referring new applications. The AI-generated output supports subject matter experts by providing additional information that helps them make faster decisions and prioritize applications for review. All AI output is used solely as an assistive tool, and every referral decision undergoes 100% human review. Therefore, this use case does not meet the definition of a high-impact AI.
- Start date
- 2025-04 (month precision)Source: Apr-25
- Withheld from public reporting
- NoSource: a) No
Mission
- Topic area
- Administrative Functions
- Operational functions
- No function tag matched Derived by keyword rules; see methodology
Problem the AI is intended to solve
The primary objective is to enhance the efficiency, accuracy, and consistency of grant application referral assignments, while reducing the burden on Subject Matter Experts in RPAB. The AI system is expected to streamline the process of internal referral of new grant applications.
Expected benefits
This AI use case increases the efficiency of the grant referral process and ensures difficult applications are triaged in a quicker manner.
System outputs
Results are presented as class predictions and class probabilities as recommendations for referral liaisons.
Technology
- AI classification
- Classical / predictive MLSource: Classical/Predictive Machine Learning: Models trained on data to make predictions or classifications based on identified patterns or relatio…
- System name(s)
- Not reported
- Custom-developed code
- Yes
- Public source code
- Not reported
Sourcing
- How it was built
- Developed in-houseSource: b) Developed in-house
- Vendor (as reported)
- Not reported
- Vendors (standardized)
- None on the standard list
A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.
Data and privacy
- Involves PII
- No
- Privacy Impact Assessment
- Not reported
- Authorization to Operate
- No
- Demographic features
- k) None of the above
- Training and evaluation data
- NIH IMPAC II funded and unfunded grant application data is used. Unstructured text from project abstract, specific aims, and title are encoded and vectorized for model training and inference. Fiscal year, activity code, and RCDC terms are transformed via one-hot encoding for use in model training and inference. PII related to individuals associated with the grant is kept intact to preserve the integrity of the use case of grant application referral and the trends of researchers' focus on particular scientific areas.
- Federal Data Catalog
- Not reported
Governance
0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.
Potential impacts and how they were identified
Not reported