JIT Automated Calculator (JAC)
Department of Health and Human Services · HHS/NIH
Overview
- Development stage
- DeployedSource: c) Deployed – The use case is being actively authorized or utilized to support the functions or mission of an agency.
- High-impact designation
- Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
- Impact justification
- Not reported
- Start date
- 2023-05 (month precision)Source: May-23
- Withheld from public reporting
- NoSource: a) No
Mission
- Topic area
- Administrative Functions
- Operational functions
- No function tag matched Derived by keyword rules; see methodology
Problem the AI is intended to solve
NIGMS requires extra justification to fund investigators whose total grant money exceeds $1.5M. Applicants are required to submit lengthy forms detailing all of their support and those of their key personnel. These forms are quite long and require quite a bit of time to read and tally up funding totals. This NLP searches the entire form and adds up all of the totals to help NIGMS program staff determine total funding for all key personnel of a grant application.
Expected benefits
At NIGMS we like to know how much total support an investigator has to ensure that we are not funding PIs who are already adequately resourced. However, JIT Other Support forms consist of many pages of freeform text in PDF format. Thus, it can be quite tedious for program officers (POs) to copy and paste information from these forms into a spreadsheet to determine how much funding a PI has. JAC can perform these calculations for POs automatically (assuming, of course, that the information has been entered correctly by the PIs).
System outputs
Input: Grant application JIT Other Support Form PDFs from NIH IMPAC II database. Output: Editable spreadsheet of parsed data and funding summary data for each person in the Key Personnel tables of the application.
Technology
- AI classification
- Natural language processingSource: Natural Language Processing: AI that processes, interprets, and shares information in human language.
- System name(s)
- Not reported
- Custom-developed code
- Yes
- Public source code
- It is not publicly available.
Sourcing
- How it was built
- Developed in-houseSource: b) Developed in-house
- Vendor (as reported)
- Not reported
- Vendors (standardized)
- None on the standard list
A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.
Data and privacy
- Involves PII
- No
- Privacy Impact Assessment
- Not reported
- Authorization to Operate
- No
- Demographic features
- k) None of the above
- Training and evaluation data
- All data come from the internal NIH IMPAC II database.
- Federal Data Catalog
- Not reported
Governance
0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.
Potential impacts and how they were identified
Not reported