GrantSolutions Recipient Risk Tool

Overview

Development stage

DeployedSource: c) Deployed – The use case is being actively authorized or utilized to support the functions or mission of an agency.

High-impact designation

Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact

Impact justification

Not reported

Start date

2019-03 (month precision)Source: Mar-19

Withheld from public reporting

NoSource: a) No

Mission

Topic area

Service Delivery

Operational functions

Fraud, waste and improper payments, Risk scoring and triage Derived by keyword rules; see methodology

Problem the AI is intended to solve

Grant managers need an efficient method to conduct risk assessments before issuing financial assistance awards to prevent fraud, waste, and abuse.

Expected benefits

Automates repetitive workflows, reduces manual effort, delivers actionable insights, and accelerates accurate, transparent decisions across the grant lifecycle.

System outputs

Generates a risk score for each prospective recipient and lists the top contributing factors (e.g. prior findings) and data sources.

Technology

AI classification

Classical / predictive MLSource: Classical/Predictive Machine Learning: Models trained on data to make predictions or classifications based on identified patterns or relatio…

System name(s)

GrantSolutions

Custom-developed code

Yes

Public source code

Not reported

Sourcing

How it was built

Contract and in-houseSource: c) Developed with both contracting and in-house resources

Vendor (as reported)

Internal Federal Shared Service (GrantSolutions)

Vendors (standardized)

None on the standard list

A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.

Data and privacy

Involves PII

No

Privacy Impact Assessment

Not reported

Authorization to Operate

Yes

Demographic features

k) None of the above

Training and evaluation data

Historical grant documents

Federal Data Catalog

Not reported

Governance

0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.

Potential impacts and how they were identified

Not reported