Federal Docket Management System
Department of Justice · Department of Justice / ATF
Overview
- Development stage
- DeployedSource: c) Deployed – The use case is being actively authorized or utilized to support the functions or mission of an agency.
- High-impact designation
- Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
- Impact justification
- Does not produce an output that serves as a principal basis for decisions or actions with legal, material, binding, or significant effect on any of the individuals or entities identified in OMB-25-21.
- Start date
- 2024-01 (month precision)Source: 01/2024
- Withheld from public reporting
- NoSource: a) No
Mission
- Topic area
- Administrative Functions
- Operational functions
- FOIA and records management Derived by keyword rules; see methodology
Problem the AI is intended to solve
This system allows agencies to receive comments that are submitted electronically in response to rulemaking initiatives. The system has features that categorize comments based on text analytics, allows agencies to make those comments public facing or redact them, and allows agencies to download the comments.
Expected benefits
This product permits agencies to review the electronic comments received in response to rulemaking. The features in FDMS allow agencies to bulk post up to 1,000 comments allowing the public to see their comments faster.
System outputs
It is the place where agencies receive comments that are electronically submitted in response to a rulemaking. It allows agencies to make those comments public facing.
Technology
- AI classification
- Computer visionSource: Computer Vision: AI that processes and interprets visual data (e.g., images and videos).
- System name(s)
- Redacted for cybersecurity purposes.
- Custom-developed code
- No
- Public source code
- Not reported
Sourcing
- How it was built
- Purchased from vendorSource: a) Purchased from a vendor
- Vendor (as reported)
- General Services Administration (GSA)
- Vendors (standardized)
- None on the standard list
A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.
Data and privacy
- Involves PII
- Yes
- Privacy Impact Assessment
- Not reported
- Authorization to Operate
- No
- Demographic features
- This AI use case utilizes one or more of the demographic variables listed in compliance with all federal laws and agency regulations.
- Training and evaluation data
- The case owner relied on DOJ AI governance practices to select and prepare data, as well as evaluate performance.
- Federal Data Catalog
- Not reported
Governance
0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.
Potential impacts and how they were identified
Not reported