Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
STATE · no agency ID · record R3248

Electronic Health Record AI Enhancements

Department of State · DT

Overview

Development stage
DeployedSource: c) Deployed – The use case is being actively authorized or utilized to support the functions or mission of an agency.
High-impact designation
High-impactSource: a) High-impact
Impact justification
Not reported
Start date
2025-03-03 (day precision)Source: 03/03/2025 00:00:00
Withheld from public reporting
NoSource: a) No

Mission

Topic area
Health and Medical
Operational functions
Summarization, Clinical and medical Derived by keyword rules; see methodology

Problem the AI is intended to solve

Provide efficient, accurate, and comprehensive medical electronic health record (EHR) management, patient care, and administrative workflows by leveraging AI-powered tools, including large language models (LLMs) and natural language processing (NLP).

Expected benefits

Improved operational efficiency, reduction of errors, and greater focus on delivering quality patient care. Improved patient data and safety with cost savings and operational efficiencies, transparency, and security. Enhanced clinical decision-making by summarizing patient information, identifying discrepancies, and generating referrals based on historical data and current inputs.

System outputs

Automated data extraction, validation, sentiment analysis, categorization, identification of document types, data discrepancies, and text summarization into structured medical chart components.

Technology

AI classification
Generative AISource: Generative AI: AI that generates new or synthetic content (e.g., images, videos, audio, text, code).
System name(s)
MED-PLTR
Custom-developed code
Yes
Public source code
Not reported

Sourcing

How it was built
Contract and in-houseSource: c) Developed with both contracting and in-house resources
Vendor (as reported)
Palantir
Vendors (standardized)
Palantir

A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.

Data and privacy

Involves PII
Yes
Privacy Impact Assessment
www.state.gov ↗
Authorization to Operate
Yes
Demographic features
b) Sex; c) Age
Training and evaluation data
MED-defined policy and definitions
Federal Data Catalog
Not reported

Governance

8 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.

Pre-deployment testingReported in placeSource: a) Yes
AI impact assessmentReported in progressSource: b) In-progress
Independent reviewReported in progressSource: d) In-progress
Ongoing monitoringReported in placeSource: a) Yes, sufficient monitoring protocols have been established
Operator trainingReported in placeSource: a) Yes, sufficient and periodic training has been established
Fail-safeReported in placeSource: a) Yes
Appeal processNot applicableSource: b) Not applicable
User and public consultationReported in placeSource: a) Direct usability testing

Potential impacts and how they were identified

Pending AI Impact Assessment