DOE · DOE-498 · record R3359
ChatGPT Enterprise
Department of Energy · LANL - Los Alamos National Lab (LAFO)
Overview
- Development stage
- DeployedSource: c) Deployed – The use case is being actively authorized or utilized to support the functions or mission of an agency.
- High-impact designation
- Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
- Impact justification
- General purpose business system
- Start date
- 2024-05-27 (day precision)Source: 2024-05-27T00:00:00
- Withheld from public reporting
- NoSource: a) No
Mission
- Topic area
- Administrative Functions
- Operational functions
- Search and knowledge retrieval Derived by keyword rules; see methodology
Problem the AI is intended to solve
"General business productivity, research of AI models "
Expected benefits
General business productivity, research of AI models
System outputs
Interactive text chat replies from user prompts, summaries of open/public/unrestricted documents user submitted for Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) through CustomGPTs
Technology
- AI classification
- Generative AISource: Generative AI: AI that generates new or synthetic content (e.g., images, videos, audio, text, code).
- System name(s)
- ChatGPT Enterprise
- Custom-developed code
- No
- Public source code
- Not reported
Sourcing
- How it was built
- Purchased from vendorSource: a) Purchased from a vendor
- Vendor (as reported)
- OpenAI (SAAS hosting provider)
- Vendors (standardized)
- OpenAI
A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.
Data and privacy
- Involves PII
- No
- Privacy Impact Assessment
- Not reported
- Authorization to Operate
- No
- Demographic features
- k) None of the above
- Training and evaluation data
- Not trained on any agency or LANL data
- Federal Data Catalog
- Not reported
Governance
8 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.
Pre-deployment testingReported in placeSource: a) Yes
AI impact assessmentReported in progressSource: b) In-progress
Independent reviewReported in placeSource: a) Yes – by another appropriate agency office or reviewer not directly involved in the AI’s development
Ongoing monitoringReported in placeSource: a) Yes, sufficient monitoring protocols have been established
Operator trainingReported in placeSource: a) Yes, sufficient and periodic training has been established
Fail-safeNot applicableSource: b) Not applicable
Appeal processNot applicableSource: b) Not applicable
User and public consultationReported in placeSource: a) Direct usability testing
Potential impacts and how they were identified
Positive impact on laboratory cost/time efficency by making a market-leading research tool available to all LANL employees