Governance and accountability

Governance evidence

What agencies reported about the OMB M-25-21 minimum practices for high-impact AI. This is a disclosure analysis, not an audit, a compliance finding or an official assessment. An unanswered question is missing evidence, not evidence that a safeguard is absent.

Governance report

Practice-by-practice evidence

Denominator: 12 records · use cases designated high-impact

Reported in progressNo answer reported

Pre-deployment testing

Pre-deployment testing
Reported in progress: 2 (16.7%)Pre-deployment testing
No answer reported: 10 (83.3%)

AI impact assessment

AI impact assessment
Reported in progress: 2 (16.7%)AI impact assessment
No answer reported: 10 (83.3%)

Independent review

Independent review
Reported in progress: 2 (16.7%)Independent review
No answer reported: 10 (83.3%)

Ongoing monitoring

Ongoing monitoring
Reported in progress: 2 (16.7%)Ongoing monitoring
No answer reported: 10 (83.3%)

Operator training

Operator training
Reported in progress: 2 (16.7%)Operator training
No answer reported: 10 (83.3%)

Fail-safe

Fail-safe
Reported in progress: 2 (16.7%)Fail-safe
No answer reported: 10 (83.3%)

Appeal process

Appeal process
Reported in progress: 2 (16.7%)Appeal process
No answer reported: 10 (83.3%)

User and public consultation

User and public consultation
Reported in progress: 2 (16.7%)User and public consultation
No answer reported: 10 (83.3%)

Practice	In scope	In progress	No answer	Answered	In place of applicable
Pre-deployment testing	12	2	10	17%	0% of 12
AI impact assessment	12	2	10	17%	0% of 12
Independent review	12	2	10	17%	0% of 12
Ongoing monitoring	12	2	10	17%	0% of 12
Operator training	12	2	10	17%	0% of 12
Fail-safe	12	2	10	17%	0% of 12
Appeal process	12	2	10	17%	0% of 12
User and public consultation	12	2	10	17%	0% of 12

Answered = records with any answer ÷ records in scope. In place of applicable = reported in place ÷ (in scope minus not applicable, precluded and waived). Unanswered records stay in that denominator, so the rate is a lower bound on reported evidence, not an estimate of real practice.

Agency-by-safeguard heatmap

Cell: share reported in place, among applicable recordsIn place Answered

Agency by governance practice
	Testing	Impact assess.	Indep. review	Monitoring	Training	Fail-safe	Appeal	Consultation	n
VA	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	9
DOJ	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2
NASA	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	1

Hatched cells: the agency answered nothing for that practice, so there is no evidence either way. Compare agencies with care: each agency is one reporting unit, and portfolios differ in size and type.

Records requiring further investigation

12 records with at least one practice unanswered or in progressOpen in explorer

Use case	Stage	Test	AIA	Review	Monitor	Train	Fail-safe	Appeal	Consult
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) DOJ · DOJ-0003	Deployed	Reported in progress	Reported in progress	Reported in progress	Reported in progress	Reported in progress	Reported in progress	Reported in progress	Reported in progress
Veritone Illuminate DOJ · DOJ-0039	Deployed	Reported in progress	Reported in progress	Reported in progress	Reported in progress	Reported in progress	Reported in progress	Reported in progress	Reported in progress
Intelligent Camera Analytics for Security and Operations NASA · NASA-753	Deployed	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported
AGFA DR 800 with MUSICA Dynamic VA · VA-24-1069	Deployed	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported
Circle CVI42 VA · VA-24-1934	Deployed	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported
EchoPAC Software Only, EchoPAC Plug-In VA · VA-24-3295	Deployed	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported
XIDF-AWS801, Angio Workstation (Alphenix Workstation), V9.5 VA · VA-24-3541	Deployed	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported
Workflow Box VA · VA-24-3705	Deployed	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported
GE Portable Critical Care Suite 2.x VA · VA-24-413	Deployed	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported
Rapid AI VA · VA-24-4353	Deployed	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported
FastStroke, CT Perfusion 4D VA · VA-24-5058	Deployed	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported
Brainlab Elements Image Fusion, Contouring (4.5);Image Fusion (4.5);Fibertracking (2.0);BOLD MRI Mapping (1.0);Image Fusion Angio (1.0) VA · VA-24-5632	Deployed	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported	No answer reported

Unanswered analytical questions

Generated from the data; for follow-up with agencies

VA designated 9 use cases high-impact but answered none of the minimum-practice questions for any of them. Were the practices assessed, and where is that recorded?
2 high-impact use cases are reported as deployed while their AI impact assessment is reported in progress. Was deployment authorised before the assessment was complete?
2 high-impact use cases report using PII but give no link to a Privacy Impact Assessment. Is a PIA published elsewhere?

These are questions the inventory raises but cannot answer. They are not findings of non-compliance.