Governance evidence
What agencies reported about the OMB M-25-21 minimum practices for high-impact AI. This is a disclosure analysis, not an audit, a compliance finding or an official assessment. An unanswered question is missing evidence, not evidence that a safeguard is absent.
Practice-by-practice evidence
Denominator: 10 records · all use cases in the current filterReported in place: 6 (60.0%)AI impact assessment
Reported in progress: 2 (20.0%)AI impact assessment
No answer reported: 2 (20.0%)
Reported in place: 7 (70.0%)Independent review
Reported in progress: 2 (20.0%)Independent review
Reported not in place: 1 (10.0%)
Reported in place: 6 (60.0%)Ongoing monitoring
Reported in progress: 3 (30.0%)Ongoing monitoring
No answer reported: 1 (10.0%)
Reported in place: 7 (70.0%)Operator training
Reported in progress: 2 (20.0%)Operator training
No answer reported: 1 (10.0%)
Reported in place: 5 (50.0%)Fail-safe
Not applicable: 4 (40.0%)Fail-safe
No answer reported: 1 (10.0%)
Reported in place: 9 (90.0%)User and public consultation
Other or ambiguous answer: 1 (10.0%)
| Practice | In scope | In place | In progress | Not in place | N/A | Precluded or waived | Other | No answer | Answered | In place of applicable |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-deployment testing | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% | 100% of 10 |
| AI impact assessment | 10 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 80% | 60% of 10 |
| Independent review | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100% | 70% of 10 |
| Ongoing monitoring | 10 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 90% | 60% of 10 |
| Operator training | 10 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 90% | 70% of 10 |
| Fail-safe | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 90% | 83% of 6 |
| Appeal process | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 90% | 0% of 1 |
| User and public consultation | 10 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 90% of 10 |
Answered = records with any answer ÷ records in scope. In place of applicable = reported in place ÷ (in scope minus not applicable, precluded and waived). Unanswered records stay in that denominator, so the rate is a lower bound on reported evidence, not an estimate of real practice.
| Testing | Impact assess. | Indep. review | Monitoring | Training | Fail-safe | Appeal | Consultation | n | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 4 |
| DOE | 100% | 0% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% | 0% | 67% | 3 |
| FERC | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 1 |
| EAC | 100% | – | 0% | – | – | – | – | 100% | 1 |
| SSA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 1 |
Hatched cells: the agency answered nothing for that practice, so there is no evidence either way. Compare agencies with care: each agency is one reporting unit, and portfolios differ in size and type.
Records requiring further investigation
5 records with at least one practice unanswered or in progressOpen in explorer| Use case | Stage | Test | AIA | Review | Monitor | Train | Fail-safe | Appeal | Consult |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Co-Pilot DOE · DOE-518 | Pilot | Reported in place | No answer reported | Reported in place | Reported in progress | Reported in progress | Not applicable | Not applicable | Reported in place |
| Soil Moisture Modeling DOE · DOE-545 | Pilot | Reported in place | Reported in progress | Reported in progress | Reported in progress | Reported in progress | Reported in place | Not applicable | Reported in place |
| M365 Copilot DOE · DOE-574 | Pilot | Reported in place | Reported in progress | Reported in progress | Reported in place | Reported in place | Reported in place | Not applicable | Other or ambiguous answer |
| AI Answers in Clearinghouse Network EAC · EAC-1 | Pilot | Reported in place | No answer reported | Reported not in place | No answer reported | No answer reported | No answer reported | No answer reported | Reported in place |
| Policy Assistance Tool (PAT) SSA · R3116 | Pilot | Reported in place | Reported in place | Reported in place | Reported in progress | Reported in place | Reported in place | Not applicable | Reported in place |
Unanswered analytical questions
Generated from the data; for follow-up with agencies- 1 high-impact use cases mark an appeal process as not applicable. On what basis was each individual outcome judged not contestable?
- 5 governance answers are ambiguous (for example, an answer option from a different question). What did the agency intend?
These are questions the inventory raises but cannot answer. They are not findings of non-compliance.