Comment Review System
Federal Reserve Board · Division of Information Technology
Overview
- Development stage
- DeployedSource: c) Deployed – The use case is being actively authorized or utilized to support the functions or mission of an agency.
- High-impact designation
- Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
- Impact justification
- Not reported
- Start date
- 2021-07-01 (day precision)Source: 2021-07-01T00:00:00
- Withheld from public reporting
- NoSource: a) No
Mission
- Topic area
- Other: Economic & FinancialSource: Other – Economic & Financial
- Operational functions
- Summarization Derived by keyword rules; see methodology
Problem the AI is intended to solve
Manage, analyze, and categorize large volumes of public comments
Expected benefits
The Comment Review System (CRS) is a system used by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Board”) to electronically process and manage comments from the public on regulatory rulemakings, information collections, and other proposals (collectively, “proposals”). The Board’s processing of comments may use artificial intelligence (AI) to provide more efficient processing of public comments (e.g., text matching, entity identification, and text similarity matching).
System outputs
To assist the analyst in reviewing each comment, CRS uses traditional machine learning natural language processing (NLP) to provide text summarization, text matching with lists of topics, entity identification, and text similarity matching. In addition, CRS identifies duplicative or near-duplicative comment letters, provides full text search (including metadata properties), and provides the optionality of providing notes or labelling comments based on various metadata attributes. All public comments are reviewed in their entirety, and summaries are used to assist with these reviews.
Technology
- AI classification
- Natural language processingSource: Natural Language Processing: AI that processes, interprets, and shares information in human language.
- System name(s)
- Comment Review System
- Custom-developed code
- Yes
- Public source code
- Not reported
Sourcing
- How it was built
- Developed in-houseSource: b) Developed in-house
- Vendor (as reported)
- Not reported
- Vendors (standardized)
- None on the standard list
A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.
Data and privacy
- Involves PII
- Yes
- Privacy Impact Assessment
- www.federalreserve.gov ↗
- Authorization to Operate
- Yes
- Demographic features
- k) None of the above
- Training and evaluation data
- External – Public Comments
- Federal Data Catalog
- Not reported
Governance
0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.
Potential impacts and how they were identified
Not reported