Federal AI Intelligence
Menu
Snapshot · OMB 2025 inventory · processed Oct 11, 2026
HHS · no agency ID · record R0660

Using Generative AI for Stance Analysis of Public Comments on CDC’s Proposed Rules

Department of Health and Human Services · HHS/CDC

Overview

Development stage
DeployedSource: c) Deployed – The use case is being actively authorized or utilized to support the functions or mission of an agency.
High-impact designation
Not high-impactSource: c) Not high-impact
Impact justification
Not reported
Start date
2023-07 (month precision)Source: Jul-23
Withheld from public reporting
NoSource: a) No

Mission

Topic area
Administrative Functions
Operational functions
Summarization Derived by keyword rules; see methodology

Problem the AI is intended to solve

Manual review of public comments for rulemaking is labor-intensive and time-consuming due to the volume and diversity of responses. The AI system automates stance analysis and topic modeling to improve efficiency, accuracy, and insight in the review process.

Expected benefits

The AI system can save significant time for CDC’s public policy experts by automating the categorization and stance analysis of public comments, enabling faster and more comprehensive insight gathering for regulatory analysis. This supports compliance with legal requirements and improves the quality of public policy review.

System outputs

The system uses generative AI to analyze public comments, providing outputs such as stance (support/oppose/neutral), topics, and sentiment for each comment. These outputs aid regulatory analysts in reviewing and summarizing public feedback.

Technology

AI classification
Generative AISource: Generative AI: AI that generates new or synthetic content (e.g., images, videos, audio, text, code).
System name(s)
Not reported
Custom-developed code
Yes
Public source code
Not reported

Sourcing

How it was built
Developed in-houseSource: b) Developed in-house
Vendor (as reported)
Not reported
Vendors (standardized)
None on the standard list

A vendor is the supplier named by the agency. It does not identify the underlying model or AI technology.

Data and privacy

Involves PII
No
Privacy Impact Assessment
Not reported
Authorization to Operate
No
Demographic features
k) None of the above
Training and evaluation data
Public comments submitted in response to CDC’s proposed rules.
Federal Data Catalog
Not reported

Governance

0 of 8 minimum-practice questions answered. A blank answer means the agency reported nothing; it does not mean the practice is absent.

Pre-deployment testingNo answer reported
AI impact assessmentNo answer reported
Independent reviewNo answer reported
Ongoing monitoringNo answer reported
Operator trainingNo answer reported
Fail-safeNo answer reported
Appeal processNo answer reported
User and public consultationNo answer reported

Potential impacts and how they were identified

Not reported